Why Nullification?

by Diane Rufino on August 26, 2013 in Nullification, Strategy

The TRUTH about nullification is that it is legitimate, and it is the only way to effect a meaningful check on the federal government when the executive, legislative, and judicial branches unite on an incorrect interpretation of the Constitution, and threaten the independence of the states and the reserved rights of the People.

The federal government CANNOT be permitted to hold a monopoly on constitutional interpretation. If the federal government has the exclusive right to judge the extent of its own powers, as Madison and Jefferson warned in 1798-99, it will continue to grow – regardless of elections, the separation of powers, and other limits on government power. Nullification has always been available to push the government back within the boundaries of the Constitution, but for too long, those hostile to the Constitution have insinuated – FALSELY – that the doctrine was the reason for the Civil War and for segregation, thereby trying to use shame to invalidate it.

We should take a cue from Patrick Henry. While others were celebrating the Constitution and rejoicing that a more effective compact was created, Henry urged them to cool their heads and take a step back – to look carefully at the document they were asked to ratify. It was his opinion that the government created by the Constitution would tend to concentrate power, strip power from the states, and become no better than England’s monarchy (“it squints toward monarchy”). He urged Virginia to reject the Constitution. He reminded the delegates that trade, power, and security should not be the first concerns on their mind. He said the proper inquiry should be “how your liberties can be better secured, for liberty ought to be the direct end of your government.”

: nullification; http://gang-stalking.be/GANG-STALKING-300-TEMOIGNAGES-DE-VICTIMES-EUROPEENES.html

On that first day of the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1788, Patrick Henry addressed the delegates with these words:

Liberty, the greatest of all earthly blessing — give us that precious jewel, and you may take everything else! Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.

When the American spirit was in its youth, the language of America was different.. Liberty, sir, was then the primary object. We are descended from a people whose government was founded on liberty: our glorious forefathers of Great Britain made liberty the foundation of everything. That country is become a great, mighty, and splendid nation; not because their government is strong and energetic, but, sir, because liberty is its direct end and foundation. We drew the spirit of liberty from our British ancestors: by that spirit we have triumphed over every difficulty. But now, sir, the American spirit, assisted by the ropes and chains of consolidation, is about to convert this country into a powerful and mighty empire. If you make the citizens of this country agree to become the subjects of one great consolidated empire of America, your government will not have sufficient energy to keep them together. Such a government is incompatible with the genius of republicanism. There will be no checks, no real balances, in this government. What can avail your pecious, imaginary balances, your rope-dancing, chain-rattling, ridiculous ideal checks and contrivances? But, sir, we are not feared by foreigners; we do not make nations tremble. Would this constitute happiness, or secure liberty? I trust, sir, our political hemisphere will ever direct their operations to the security of those objects.”

http://www.gang-stalking.be/GANG-STALKING-300-TEMOIGNAGES-DE-VICTIMES-EUROPEENES.html

The jury is still out on this thing we call the Great American Experiment.

We separated from Great Britain when we insisted on governing ourselves consistent without our own values. Those values were articulated in the Declaration of Independence. Contrary to the “divine right of Kings” which was the system respected in Britain, the American colonies would establish a government “of the people, by the people, and FOR the people.” It would go one step further.. it would establish a government whose powers were derived from the people themselves (so that the people could always take them back when they were fed up with that government).

While the British people had to stand up for their rights many times, Americans have never done so since the Revolutionary War. The British protested and demanded that the King respect their rights in 1100 (resulting in the 1100 Charter of Liberties), in 1215 (the Magna Carta or “Great Charter”), in 1628 (the Petition of Right of 1628), in 1641 (The Grand Remonstrances of 1641), in 1679 (the Habeas Corpus Act), and finally in 1689 (English Bill of Rights of 1689). [The Grand Remonstrances and The English Bill of Rights, like our Declaration of Independence, set out lists of grievances against the King for usurpation of the rights that were proclaimed in the earlier charters]. The interesting thing about history of the British people in asserting their rights and demanding restraint from their government is that each time they did so, they were able to secure greater freedom. We can take a lesson from British history.

: the neverending porch (Photo credit: loungerie)

There is another great distinction between the British system and ours. When the kings signed those charters, they often did so very reluctantly. For example, almost immediately after King John (the infamous King John of the Robin Hood legend) signed the Magna Carta, he ignored it. It was ignored on and off until the 17th century. The point is that the rights of the people were enjoyed at the mercy of the king. There was no meaningful way to enforce the charters. Parliament tried to, but as with King Charles I (son of King James I, who granted the charters to the Pilgrims and Puritans to settle in America), when Parliament tried to force his hand, he turned around and dissolved it.

Our Founding Fathers intended that our Constitution and Bill of Rights would be stand the test of time, guarantee the proper relationship between the People and government, and not jeopardize the rights and liberties of the people. That’s why they divided power among two equal sovereigns (power to check power) and why they included so many checks and balances.

To deny nullification is a dangerous decision. To deny it is to: (i) deny the wisdom of our Founders; (ii) trust your rights to a government which is growing more hostile to them by the day; and (iii) submit to the notion that government is capable of restraining itself and capable of divesting itself of all the unconstitutional powers it has already assumed and repealing such laws it has passed.

Liberty must always come first. Liberty is a gift, as KrisAnne Hall says, that we must pay forward. We don’t pay it forward by not second-guessing the actions of the federal government, especially when we know it likes to enlarge its powers at every chance. We don’t pay it forward by accepting the government’s version that constitutional remedies that were put in place by our founders to preserve the rights on which this country are founded are no longer valid. We pay it forward by preserving it. We do that by using every option we have to limit the intrusion of government in our lives and over our property. Our Constitution is not the living, breathing document that the progressives and federal judges claim it to be. For if that is the case, it can be twisted so completely as to destroy our understanding of it. The only things that is living and breathing are us, the citizens of the United States, who have inherited a precious gift of freedom to live our lives and raise our families. And so let’s use the common sense and spark of brilliance that God so endowed us with when he also endowed us with free will and inherent rights.

http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/08/why-nullification-2/#.Ui84wK6mI7w

: Neverending (Photo credit: TinaOable)

ICAACT Phase III testing Mr Benjamin Simon- report on rf scanning in a schielded environment from Benjamin Simon on Vimeo.

BENJAMIN SIMON - VOICE TO SKULL - 24/7 - DETECTION - ANECHOIC CHAMBER - IMPORTANT

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10201818253525878&l=3294741884236777434

Au niveau physique, je suis detecté par les plus grands spécialistes au monde : Lars Drudgaard, Barrie Trower, Dr Jhon Hall ...regroupés au sein de http:/www.icaact.org pour combattre le terrorisme le plus virulent et ordurier ayant jamais existé !

Ces benevoles ont composé des dossiers pour des milliers de victimes de par le monde qu'ils sillonnent de long en large pour aider des personnes en cours d'assassinats par les ondeurs de cointelpro-gang-stalking, ect

http://fr.scribd.com/doc/157473281/stalking-organisationnel-directed-energy-weapons-300-victimes-EUROPE

https://www.facebook.com/notes/benjamin-simon/local-cops-are-flagged-and-involved-in-the-sg-os-for-four-years-in-many-ways/10201766571273854

RESUME

http://fr.scribd.com/doc/133806106/Police-de-Ciney-Last-Mail-About-Local-Gang-Stalking-Belgium

21 Janvier 2013

1 - http://www.scribd.com/doc/124898065/MadameLaProcureurDuRoideDinantBelgique21JanvierFaxGangStalkingBSimon

29 juillet 2013

2 - http://www.scribd.com/doc/102015551/MonsieurAppartProcureurDuRoiDinantGangStalkingPublique

15 fevrier 2013

3 - https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-qPPBUqE7YjYWlqeFE3bGdnMTg/
4 - https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-qPPBUqE7YjSGZ4TnJ1M2hDU1U/edit
5 - https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-qPPBUqE7YjeUgwYjNFRDcxTlk/edit
6 - https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-qPPBUqE7YjOVhrblJzc3NfRms/edit
7 - https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-qPPBUqE7YjTzJyc3RPY3dmZnM/edit

Mes ecrtits sont validés par Roberto Scaruffi....qui suit mon travail depuis le debut.

Roberto Scaruffi,Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil• Degree [“doctor”] in Political Sciences [major in Economics] from the University of Turin; • EAP course by the Essex University (score 7 in IELTS); • DEA by the UCL in LLN (Belgium); • completed and finally [Spring 2002] academically perfect Ph.D. research by the UCL in LLN (Belgium) [[formal PhD still not awarded since an annihilation operation (an [failed] operation for producing State/“government” managed terrorism) of Italian Secret Police Bureaux with very active cooperation of NATO Secret Police Bureaux at world level; ask them... http://www.uclouvain.be/ ; http://www.carabinieri.it/ ; http://www.comiteri.be/ ; http://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/ ; http://www.nato.int/ ; http://www.interpol.int/ ; information from here: http://scaruffi.blogspot.com/ ; the Ph.D. research is academically perfect and it is NOT failed!]]; • Chinese language classes by three universities in China [PRC] and Taiwan [RoC]

http://robertoscaruffi.blogspot.com/

Je possède toute les preuves nécessaires pour l’annihilation de ce réseau depuis deux ans.

La police en a. Les flics de Ciney et d'Andenne ont participé à mon stalking depuis quatre ans via des faux documents entre autre (disponible et avérés faux).

J'ai tout donné a la POLICE Ciney en juillet il y a deux ans et ils on continué à me détruire malgré que le dossier les mettait hors cause à mon sujet. Ils m'ont fait taire à chaque rencontre de manière dégueulasse.

Je suis maintenant sans argents et sans voiture à cause de cette affaire et je n'ai jamais pu être entendu.

Au niveaux informatique, j'ai toute les preuves nécessaires de mon hacking depuis plus e trois ans (creeper = stuxnet, le worm d'arpanet) et j'ai le droit de recevoir l'analyse de mon web.

JE SUIS BLOQUES. Nous sommes plein de victimes et nous avons des chose (VITALES) les unes pour les autres.